Regional MNCH Coordinator
| Merit | Name | Roll number | Marks | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Israrullah Khan | PPHIB/Regional-MNCH-Coordi/2026/002/0053 | 76/100 (76%) | Selected 1 |
| 2 | Muhammad Uzair khan | PPHIB/Regional-MNCH-Coordi/2026/002/0114 | 73.5/100 (74%) | Selected 2 |
| 3 | Ghulam Yasin | PPHIB/Regional-MNCH-Coordi/2026/002/0058 | 70.75/100 (71%) | Selected 3 |
| 4 | Sadiq Amin | PPHIB/Regional-MNCH-Coordi/2026/002/0198 | 70/100 (70%) | Selected 4 |
| 5 | Salar Khan Satakzai | PPHIB/Regional-MNCH-Coordi/2026/002/0047 | 69.5/100 (70%) | Selected 5 |
| 6 | Kaleem Ullah | PPHIB/Regional-MNCH-Coordi/2026/002/0145 | 67/100 (67%) | Waiting 1 |
| 7 | Rawal Kumar | PPHIB/Regional-MNCH-Coordi/2026/002/0083 | 60.5/100 (61%) | Waiting 2 |
| 8 | Niaz Hussain | PPHIB/Regional-MNCH-Coordi/2026/002/0019 | 59.75/100 (60%) | Waiting 3 |
| 9 | Mohib Ullah Shah | PPHIB/Regional-MNCH-Coordi/2026/002/0247 | 57/100 (57%) | Waiting 4 |
| 10 | Ghulam Yaseen | PPHIB/Regional-MNCH-Coordi/2026/002/0241 | 56.25/100 (56%) | Waiting 5 |
| 11 | Muhammad Farooq | PPHIB/Regional-MNCH-Coordi/2026/002/0189 | 56/100 (56%) | Waiting 6 |
| 12 | Mahkan Gul | PPHIB/Regional-MNCH-Coordi/2026/002/0044 | 55/100 (55%) | Waiting 7 |
| 13 | Zohaib Ahmed | PPHIB/Regional-MNCH-Coordi/2026/002/0084 | 54.25/100 (54%) | Waiting 8 |
| 14 | Muhammad Saeed Khan Tareen | PPHIB/Regional-MNCH-Coordi/2026/002/0153 | 52.5/100 (53%) | Waiting 9 |
| 15 | ATTA U REHMAN | PPHIB/Regional-MNCH-Coordi/2026/002/0003 | 52/100 (52%) | Waiting 10 |
| 16 | Shoaib Khan | PPHIB/Regional-MNCH-Coordi/2026/002/0025 | 52/100 (52%) | Waiting 11 |
| 17 | Irfan Hakeem | PPHIB/Regional-MNCH-Coordi/2026/002/0193 | 51.75/100 (52%) | Waiting 12 |
| 18 | Hiader khan | PPHIB/Regional-MNCH-Coordi/2026/002/0236 | 50.75/100 (51%) | Waiting 13 |
| 19 | Mian Abdul Hayee | PPHIB/Regional-MNCH-Coordi/2026/002/0085 | 50.75/100 (51%) | Waiting 14 |
91 candidates appeared in the test but did not reach the pass mark, so they are not ranked here. They can see their own result on the result page.
Ties were settled by: Candidates are placed in order of total marks obtained, the written (multiple-choice) and spoken sections taken together. Where totals are equal, the candidate with higher written marks is placed higher; where those are also equal, the candidate with higher spoken marks; then the candidate with greater verified experience; and where those are equal, the older candidate.
